🔗 Share this article

I have some thoughts about the remarks delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz during the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is American – and sports often encourage nationalism. Some disappointment would have been understandable. Rather, he brought up the continued drought of American men at the majors: none of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, me too. But come on. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the next round, who he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he somehow gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, against whom Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven major titles (plus Alcaraz went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). Fritz said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually liked his path, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the three best competitors in the world in succession. Fritz is more than justified to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match what other person sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the world starting this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with growing comfort. It's likely he might claim that position for himself in the future. But evidently that right now, that is as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite serve and powerful power on both forehand and backhand are more than enough to dispose of the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, he is frequently overmatched. The last several years has seen the interesting emergence of lanky, towering players who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and fluidity of smaller men. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was dictating, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite severe restriction on his upside.

Fritz has made a number of dramatic, unexpected advancements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was approaching the top 10. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged up to fourth place – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the ongoing drought of American men lifting grand slams when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

The American's play in that very last eight match should have been enough of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for moments towards the very end, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz creating plenty of opportunities to break. But Djokovic rescued break point after break point, extending the streak to the point of agony. When he finally did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous service game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and compelled him to expend far too much effort to win it. Facing match points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to the sky. He extended the contest twice on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It was not a collapse, I didn’t think, just a consequence of needing to hit too many second serves.

The match was fairly compelling proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and did not especially appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he would.

The American is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in press conferences, more so than virtually anyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just express his emotions or the strategy he believed determined a match, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for the United States not spawn a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can divide that load.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely think about it forever if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed a journalist in June of winning a major. I hope he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying empire is actually extremely unlikely for all other players. {